Ken Wilber.com Redesign!!
Posted on Apr 27th, 2006
by
Casey
The new Ken Wilber.com site is live and freshly redesigned! As one would expect, it is aesthetically distinctive and stunning. Ken has embraced the blogoshpere and has an entire section devoted to integral blogging. My post about our dinner with Amory Lovins is resyndicated over there ;) I gotta say, its pretty hot.







Very cool! So, is Ken actually going to do some blogging, or has he reserved it only for people whose names begin with the letter “C”?
C for Chaos!!!!
hahaha. newsflash: as of this writing, kenwilber.com is still not that cool. check it :P
so you don't like the new site? or your are not seeing the new site? perhaps your browser has cached the old one?
hahaha. my bad. you're right. i say if there's a way to force the old version out then it should be done. my two cents. people are not fond of clicking refresh :)
I love clicking refresh!! Especially when I feel groggy.
The site is awesome! Who's responsible for the design? Casey? Paul?
Ken outsourced this project to Ursa Minor Web Design http://www.ursaminor.com/
maybe we should let them have their way with IN??
“maybe we should let them have their way with IN??”
sounds like a cool idea to me. but i say make the main IN engine a blogging engine :P
Why the requirement for Flash 8? Macromedia has only released through Flash 7 for Linux and Mac. There is a beta client for the Mac, but users shouldn't be required to run beta (ie. unstable) software.
jeesh bodhigeek! get a life! or pc or a clone or whatever. good point though :)
but still, LINUX WILL NOT SAVE THE WORLD!
ok. bodhigeek, i've read your techy rant and you seem to have a very good point. so i'm just going to re-post my response here so that Casey may shed some light on this.
well, actually, after digging deep through the site, there are lots of advanced Flash stuff that were incorporated. you really have to see it first.
but then again i will still relay your rant even though i think it could be a moot point at this point since this site is not just ONE site but MULTIPLE sites all woven almost-seamlessly together.
I like the ken wilber site. I also think that the integral naked site needs to be redone. It is clumsy. Of course, all these integral sites really need to be multiplexed online somehow; I-I seems to be well organized and multi-connected.
I like the new ken wilber site. I think integral naked needs to be redone. It is clumsy. Perhaps the I-I site look could be carried forward…though I'm sure any good web-designer will talk abou the need to have each area “branded” a certain way. I'd just like more functionality at IN.